Le port du masque obligatoire : ce n’est pas pour une raison de santé publique

ARTICLES

masque-2-scaled

Le port du masque obligatoire : ce n’est pas pour une raison de santé publique

– Parce que ce n’est pas nécessaire…
– Parce que la science n’appuie pas leur efficacité…
– Parce que la courbe est aplatie…
– Parce qu’on n’éliminera pas le virus…
– Parce qu’il n’y a eu que 500 morts en dehors des CHSLD et des résidences pour personnes âgées au Québec, et ce, sans masque dans les 4 derniers mois…
– Parce que la peur nous rend obéissants…
– Parce qu’un mensonge répété mille fois semble devenir une vérité…

#noussommesdesmoutons

Courbe de cas Canada

Références :
– Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
“N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds”.

– Cowling, B. et al. (2010) : https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
“None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H).”

– bin-Reza et al. (2012) : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x?fbclid=IwAR1Q4oI0OyfvkVI46Uct8qPDa4HjALH4SusQM-fr_34_ITU79sE2O9S-cII
“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”

– Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) : https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
“We identified 6 clinical studies … In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”

– Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) : https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant”

– Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) : https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

– Long, Y. et al. (2020) : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
“A total of six RCTs involving 9 171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

– Article de La Presse (mars 2020)
https://www.lapresse.ca/covid-19/2020-03-18/quebec-demande-aux-citoyens-de-ne-pas-porter-de-masque?fbclid=IwAR3wEHMTtmW365enaas9DJ4cY72cf62fWRyH2_VsizwW9_qa2Xp4xzvJce4
“Le masque n’est pas un moyen de protection des infections dans la communauté…. Dans les faits, si vous voulez vous protéger, ce n’est pas le masque qui est important. Lavez-vous donc les mains”. Dr. Horacio Arruda

– Courbe de cas au Canada : https://sante-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/resume-epidemiologique-cas-covid-19.html?fbclid=IwAR2IWAF27c0BdPro1urwVU9A8g7Je42geUdAfd13unMNDpNauhLL_sRu3is